Hiring & selection
From unstructured applications to consistent candidate packets ready for your hiring committee.
Institutional evaluation infrastructure
Structure who and what qualifies at your institutional boundary.
Pier sits between your institution and the outside world, structuring external submissions into requirement-fit decisions your teams can act on and defend. Handle more volume without losing evaluation integrity.
Everything you need
The evaluation operating system for your institutional boundary.
Model your requirements once, evaluate every case consistently, and deliver structured decision packets with traceable rationale.
You set review intent up front, and the agent executes against your criteria.
Identity Document Verification·Step 1/9·Cycle 1
Verification Owner · Decision Owner
Awaiting communication
Pier Agent
Received submission
fromApplicant
Applicant · Submitter
Identity Verification
- Model your requirements once
- Capture how your institution defines qualified across roles, programs, vendors, and investments.
- Evaluate every case consistently
- Map every inbound submission against explicit criteria, with no silent evidence gaps.
- Adaptive follow-up
- Ask targeted, contextual questions until each requirement reaches a clear state.
- Structured decision packets
- Deliver recommendation rationale, evidence alignment, and next-best actions in one packet.
- Cross-case learning
- Surface bias and variance patterns before they compound across teams and locations.
- Built for governance
- Role-based access, immutable logs, retention controls, and audit-ready records by default.
How Pier works
From requirements to decisions in four integrated steps.
- 01
Model your requirements
Capture qualification criteria and fit logic for each boundary you manage: applicants, vendors, claimants, or investments. Define once; apply everywhere.
- 02
Ingest and structure external submissions
Pier ingests forms, documents, and messages, mapping them against your requirement model in real time.
- 03
Detect gaps and gather evidence
When evidence is missing or ambiguous, Pier initiates targeted follow-up, asking precise contextual questions until each requirement has a clear state.
- 04
Deliver decision packets
Your team receives a structured recommendation for each case with evidence aligned to criteria, traceable rationale, and clear next actions.
Solutions for every institutional boundary
Whether you're evaluating people, vendors, claims, or investments, Pier brings structure and integrity to your decision process.
Admissions & enrollment
Make every applicant comparable against explicit criteria while preserving context and rigor.
Vendor & procurement qualification
Standardize third-party intake, evidence collection, and approvals from one boundary.
Capital allocation & investment committees
Turn inbound pitches and diligence artifacts into comparable recommendation packets.
Eligibility, benefits & claims
Map every claimant or beneficiary to policy rules with evidence and rationale captured.
Compliance & risk intake
Ensure every report or incident is evaluated against policy and regulation from day one.
Measurable outcomes for institutional operations
When evaluation becomes infrastructure, the impact shows up in capacity, speed, and defensibility.
2-3x
Evaluation throughput
Pier removes manual back-and-forth, re-interpretation loops, and inconsistent follow-up so your team processes more cases in less time.
50-70%
Fewer unstructured follow-ups
Adaptive prompts collect missing evidence in a single guided flow, replacing scattered email threads with structured, traceable requests.
100%
Audit-ready records
Every decision and its rationale are captured as structured artifacts, ready for review, appeal, or succession at any point.
Why evaluation needs infrastructure now
AI has made it cheap to generate polished, complete-looking submissions. It hasn't made those submissions easier to evaluate.
- Inbound volume is growing across every institutional workflow: hiring, admissions, procurement, and compliance alike.
- External signals are increasingly synthetic and homogeneous. Surface-level screening can't keep up.
- Existing tools optimize for speed or task movement. Neither addresses evaluation integrity.
Pier treats evaluation integrity as infrastructure, not a best effort by overloaded teams.
| What it does | What it doesn't do | |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow tools | Move tasks between people | Evaluate whether submissions meet criteria |
| Screening AI | Score or rank inputs, often opaquely | Explain what qualifies or why |
| Pier | Structures who and what qualifies, with explicit criteria, evidence, and traceable rationale | Replace human judgment or authority |
PIER.INFRA
Agentic loop status
intake follow-up evaluate
evidence captured
loop initialized 35d ago
intake follow-up evaluate
1.2M dps
Requirements met
decision complete
99.98%
decision complete
Built for regulated and high-stakes environments
Security and auditability aren't add-ons. They're part of the infrastructure.
Role-based access controls
Across teams and regions
Immutable logs
Of every interaction and decision
Configurable retention and export
For audits and compliance
Secure, auditable records
At every step of every workflow
Pier gives us structured, decision-ready packets that hold up in committee review and audit scrutiny.
Evaluation Operations Director
Multi-workflow institutional team
Pricing
Choose the right plan for your team
Pricing aligned to case volume, governance requirements, and integration depth.
Growth
Custom /month
For teams scaling qualification throughput with strong consistency.
- Qualification logic engine
- Adaptive evaluation loop
- Decision packet outputs
- Standard integrations
Enterprise
Custom /month
For regulated environments with strict governance and audit requirements.
- Everything in Growth
- Advanced governance controls
- Audit export and retention policies
- Dedicated implementation support
Frequently asked questions
-
No. Humans remain in control of approvals, overrides, and final authority while Pier structures and accelerates evaluation.
-
Pier sits at the institutional boundary and feeds your ATS, CRM, ERP, and procurement systems via API and webhooks.
-
Pier applies explicit qualification logic and produces traceable rationale, rather than opaque scoring alone.
-
Yes. Pier includes role-based access, immutable logs, and configurable retention/export to support audit requirements.
Request demo
Structure who and what qualifies with confidence.
Define criteria once. Apply consistently. Capture every decision. Improve over time.